Is Virtual Etiquette Different from Real World Etiquette?

 

I had an interesting experience recently that reminded me of Surinder’s post on what he sees as some negative trends in email communication, only this experience happened in Second Life. I was visiting an area dedicated to online learning when I ran into another avatar–I’ll call him Mike–who began speaking with me. Mike immediately told me that he was demonstrating Second Life to a class of about 25 students, who were not there in avatar form but I can assume were watching our interaction on a screen.  I texted “hi” to the class and informed them that I conduct research on virtual worlds and their use for collaboration and training. Mike proceeded to ask me questions about Second Life and how it is and isn’t useful for student learning. He also asked me about any potential legal or other types of issues that I anticipate or might have already encountered with students. I gave answers from my point of view and current knowledge in hopes of contributing something worthwhile to Mike’s demonstration of Second Life. After about 10 minutes Mike said, “well, we need to move on,” and left.

This situation left me a little disconcerted, and led me to think about what constitutes etiquette in professional or semi-professional interactions between strangers in Second Life or other virtual worlds, or if there is such a thing.  Mainly I am left with questions, not answers. I am hoping that others in the leading virtually community will have input regarding how these types of random interactions might be made beneficial to all involved. In this post I will cover:

  • How much should be disclosed about one’s real situation?
  • What opportunities for feedback should exist?
  • Is “thank you” necessary?
  • Should the rules of engagement from the real world be carried over to the virtual?

I said that the experience left me a little disconcerted because I had spent some of my time and energy to assist Mike in his class demonstration and to give answers to his questions that were as thoughtful as possible though off-the-cuff. Afterward I found that I didn’t feel very satisfied by the experience, however. It was not like meeting a person at a conference and discussing pros and cons of virtual worlds face-to-face and it was not like being invited as a guest speaker into someone’s classroom. I had no verbal or non-verbal feedback.  I didn’t even know who I was talking to! I was left wondering what Mike or the students’ reactions were to my answers. Did they agree or disagree?  Was I telling them things they already believed or knew, challenging their assumptions, or talking about concepts that they had no interest in? Deliberation over the incident led me to the three questions above regarding virtual world etiquette and norms.

How much should be disclosed about one’s real situation?
In this situation Mike immediately informed me that he was demonstrating Second Life to a class. Therefore I knew immediately that there were other people observing our interaction although I could not see them. He could just have easily begun asking me questions he was interested in without informing me of the presence of the others or his purpose. Had I not known that others were “listening in” would I have felt better about our conversation in the end and assumed it was just a conversation with another person interested in the same subjects?

On the other hand, I was not informed of the type of students that were being given the demonstration and the purpose behind the demonstration. This didn’t give me a chance to tailor my answers to the appropriateness of the situation or the audience. For example, if I had known that the students were masters level students already using Second Life, I could have given answers as a higher level, or had I known it was a demonstration wanting to show the ultimate “uselessness” of Second Life, I could have highlighted ways in which Second Life is beneficial to people. This feeling of uncertainty led me to my next question.

What opportunities for feedback should exist?
My communication with the unknown students was completely mediated by the avatar Mike. I had no way of knowing if the questions were coming directly from Mike or from the students via Mike. I also had no way of knowing if the students found my answers helpful, nonsensical, or somewhere in between. But since I was blind to the reactions of the others, I think that Mike should have shared either critical or supportive feedback from the class regarding the discussion since I had agreed to be an impromptu speaker for the class. Such feedback doesn’t have to be detailed but could be as simple as “they are nodding their heads” or “they disagree with that idea.” This type of feedback shows that the speaker (me) is being listened to and also engages the me in the dialogue as an active participant.

Is “thank you” necessary?
Lastly, my conversation with Mike’s class ended with a “we need to move on,” rather than a “thanks for your time.” This brought me back to Surinder’s post regarding the trend in a lack of a showing of appreciation for work accomplished. This would have been an opportunity to say that the outside insight was beneficial, even if they didn’t agree with me or that they appreciated the effort I took to engage with them. I’m sure that Mike was busy running his class, and I know it can be difficult to run a demonstration of Second Life while also engaging your class, but I know that this type of dismissal wouldn’t happen in a non-virtual environment with a classroom guest.

Should the rules of engagement from the real world carry over to the virtual?
Finally, I’m left with the question of whether we should be conducting ourselves in the virtual world as if we are in the real world when asking others to contribute to our projects, presentations, or inviting speakers in-world to address our teams. My personal opinion is that we need some of these real world social norms to persist in the virtual world in order to maintain positive relationships and reputations. What do you think? I’d love to hear other experiences and opinions.

Article written by

3 Responses

  1. Riven Homewood
    Riven Homewood at |

    I spend a good deal of time in Caledon,and one of the things I like best there is the culture of Victorian politeness. It is so easy to misunderstand things in text chat that it’s really worth taking the time to be polite, even to be overly polite.

    I’m guessing that the person you met didn’t mean to be rude. He was probably nervous himself. The fact that he didn’t take the time to have somebody he knew meet him and his class inworld suggests that he may have not been very experienced with SL. The questions he asked are pretty typical of newbie educators.

  2. Hal
    Hal at |

    I see little difference between online etiquette and good manners with people on this side of the screen. The old saw, “It takes 15 minutes to say thank you to someone. It takes 15 years for them to forget if you don’t” is applicable in any situation.

    I find myself less responsive to those who hide behind the anonymity of online communication, even if I know them in the real world.

    If something is worth saying, say it well and with good manners, or be quiet. It is too easy to forget this online – we need to make this an ongoing effort to correct. Cynic that I am, I don’t see this happening.

  3. Don’t Muddy The Digital Waters |
    Don’t Muddy The Digital Waters | at |

    […] especially in this intense period of online social networking, can easily be blurred. We know that etiquette and manners are necessary in either world, yet sometimes in the digital sphere we say things we would never […]

Please comment with your real name using good manners.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.